About Yasmine: the revolt of a reader
11/01/2011
Hello the shareholders,
I am a reader abonnée and assiduous your magazine, which enchants me usually. By affection and honesty from you I had to express my anger and my irritation after reading your article on "the revolt of a hardeuse
bondage toys."
What is in this interview with the former favorite of the productions Marc Dorcel?
The porn industry is rotten to the root, that porn actresses are creatures necessarily unhappy and depressed and a career of hardeuse is dangerous for what it probably led to prostitution and cosmetic surgery. This would be, according to you, to avoid. Porn would be even deadly if one refers to Philippe Vecchi, the author of the article, requesting ingénument to Yasmine if it happened to him "to feel that X was [the] die in one way or another".
In short, it would be to fight against this terrible enterprise, as suggested by the leaflet which agreement, knows too why, your paper: AntiPornMenProject. A site for detoxification is porn.
True porn of the actors and actresses working conditions are appalling in their large majority. But it allows to make the General and intemperate shortcuts as your columnist can do in this interview?
Poor practices in the filming of X call into question the pornographic subject itself? Have idea to condemn the textile, entire industry, for the reason that there are operating in this area?
I see, dear magazine as a contradiction in your n ° 788: most peppered coverage, made pretty faces with an X in purple satin, who hides a section moralistic content, in which we learn that the men should "clean up their sexuality!"
I am offence to ambivalence cowardly and dishonest to your article, questions deliberately politically
glass dildos correct and reductive, illustrated by unnecessarily sexy photos of Yasmine who do not hide the emptiness of it.
Grace, let the right-thinking to the hypocrites and made hard us the brain with well packaged items.